<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working in PR: an experienced in-house leader talks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://craigpearce.info/public-relations/working-in-pr-an-experienced-in-house-leader-talks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://craigpearce.info/public-relations/working-in-pr-an-experienced-in-house-leader-talks/</link>
	<description>Short-term pain for long-term gain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://craigpearce.info/public-relations/working-in-pr-an-experienced-in-house-leader-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 10:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigpearce.info/?p=449#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sharmin. Fully agree. This characteristic is one that separates the also-ran PR pros with those who truly add value.

Arguably, you can say this about any profession. But PR pros need to represent the non-organisational perspective more than most. If anything, we need to get inside the head of those who disagree with organisations.

It is not easy to present a dissenting perspective, but if we don&#039;t do it few others will. Without the dissenting perspective, there are two ramifications:
- an organisation will not get to learn/improve/evolve
- an organisation make make a move/decision that will not be in its own best interests, let alone those of its stakeholders. This may have wide ranging and far reaching implications (most of them negative).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sharmin. Fully agree. This characteristic is one that separates the also-ran PR pros with those who truly add value.</p>
<p>Arguably, you can say this about any profession. But PR pros need to represent the non-organisational perspective more than most. If anything, we need to get inside the head of those who disagree with organisations.</p>
<p>It is not easy to present a dissenting perspective, but if we don&#8217;t do it few others will. Without the dissenting perspective, there are two ramifications:<br />
- an organisation will not get to learn/improve/evolve<br />
- an organisation make make a move/decision that will not be in its own best interests, let alone those of its stakeholders. This may have wide ranging and far reaching implications (most of them negative).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharmin</title>
		<link>http://craigpearce.info/public-relations/working-in-pr-an-experienced-in-house-leader-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigpearce.info/?p=449#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>Good post - I enjoyed reading it very much. I&#039;ve been on both sides; agency and in-house and I agree that it&#039;s counterproductive to tell people what they want to hear. What sets us apart is our ability to take a step back and provide counsel - so stand by your logical and unbiased advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post &#8211; I enjoyed reading it very much. I&#8217;ve been on both sides; agency and in-house and I agree that it&#8217;s counterproductive to tell people what they want to hear. What sets us apart is our ability to take a step back and provide counsel &#8211; so stand by your logical and unbiased advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

