Working in PR: 17 reasons why agencies fly, in-house sighs

In the partner post to this one, I presented 14 reasons why working in public relations in-house kicks agency butt. This post, obviously, presents the flipside.

Working in a PR agency is one of the most exciting, valuable and positive experiences any PR professional can have. In the early years of your career, in particular, you are less hamstrung by process and get your hands on a range of projects. Agency employees are often perceived as experts; it presents a range of professional and life opportunities; and you are surrounded by peers who understand the discipline and provide excellent support.

What do you need to work in a PR agency? Hunger and a can-do attitude. Wallflowers need not apply

But what do you think?

The advantages of agency PR roles

1. As you are working at a remove from an organisation, this distance often allows you to see issues more objectively and more clearly, thus helping develop solutions that those in the ‘organisational mist’ don’t generate.

2. Without a doubt, working in an agency is a more pressurised, and hence more dynamic, environment than in-house. This can facilitate a quick learning curve because of the exposure to different responsibilities you are given and the faith that is placed in your skills.

3. You are more likely to be perceived as being an expert in a certain area of professional communication (i.e. look at how agency employees dominate speaker line ups at conferences). Social media is currently an excellent example of this, but so is government relations/lobbying, media relations and CSR.

4. Speaking of experts, Geoff Kelly made the excellent point in a Public Relations of Australia LinkedIn discussion of my preceding post that often external consultants are respected and viewed as experts partially because they are…external! Great for both self-esteem and getting relevant, productive and interesting communication programs into play.

5. Despite often being introduced to an organisation to carry out tactical projects (with media relations and social media being king and queen), this often evolves into agencies making important strategic contributions to an organisation’s communication. This can be relevant to the specific project an agency is brought on-board for, or it can evolve into a broader remit, one that impacts on the fundamental nature of an organisation’s communication.

6. Winning new business is a great buzz. It needs to be, because as you get more senior in an agency it will always part of your responsibilities. The new biz process is outside the ‘PR process’ (strategy and tactics), but PR pros’ typical skills of networking, customising activity to stakeholder needs and empathy strongly come into play in the new business process. For some, it is an additive elixir…and it is ALWAYS a challenge.

7. Through interaction with a diverse range of businesses, issues and people, you will learn a lot about the world and you will, without even trying, be presented with a range of opportunities – PR/work-related and personal. You just need to be sensitive to these opportunities and not sleep walk through life.

8. By working with a variety of clients and in a diversity of industries, it gives you a great insight into the sorts of PR areas and industries you’d like to work in. This doesn’t mean you have to devote your entire career to these niche areas or industries, but it can help you learn where you will be most fulfilled.

PR areas include media relations, social media, CSR, public affairs, issues & crisis management, publications (e.g. annual reports) community liaison, event management, consumer, B2B and many more.

Industries include FMCG, utilities, renewables, NFP, government, engineering, architecture, resources and many more.

9. You can progress your career more quickly. Opportunities tend to come up in agencies for promotion more often than in-house. The war for talent seems to be stronger in agencies than in-house and agencies work hard to offer interesting roles at competitive packages. This means you can nearly always negotiate different responsibilities, experiences and opportunities into your role, even if increased remuneration isn’t always an option on the table.

10. You are less likely to be typecast into roles, which can occur in-house. Recruiters love to pigeonhole candidates. It makes their lives easier. Working in an agency means you are perceived, as a default, as being very flexible and able to adapt to the needs of a diversity of roles and industry areas.

11. It is much easier to get an in-house role with an agency background than the other way around. The former is the more common path. The simple reason is that if you have proved yourself in the furnace of agency life, you should definitely be able to make it in the, typically, less mentally and emotionally draining/demanding world of in-house PR.

12. One of my highly respected peers, Graham White (@GWhiteOz), believes it is less lonely working in PR when you are in an agency. Possibly Graham thinks that because in an agency you will have many (or very many!) PR peers who have a good understanding of the pressures and opportunities of working in the field. Working in-house you may be a sole operator or part of a small team, which can lead to perceptions of not feeling understood or appreciated in your role. ‘MadeTheSwitch’ said as much after making the switch to in-house PR. And in the same comments section Nicola said she really struggled to get moral and professional support.

13. You can generally negotiate a greater degree of work-life balance into an agency role. This is my experience, anyway. Promises of working from home and flexible hours are easy to give, but not so easy for any organisation/agency to follow through with, no matter how well-intentioned. The employee – not the employer – really needs to ensure the promises are fulfilled. There are no free passes in this area.

14. You are less likely to waste your life away in meetings when working in an agency, according to Marc Cornelius, who flagged this in a Public Relations and Communications Professionals LinkedIn discussion. By implication, you get to spend more time on ‘doing’ and ‘achieving’ then pontificating. Fair comment, I thought.

15. You are less likely to fall victim to client internal politics when you are working in an external agency, Marc also said. I don’t think this is necessarily true; politics has a way of wending its fingers around you when you work with a client long enough!

16. Working in an agency can lead to equity in the business. This is great if you want to eventually run your own show. You can often get experience in running a business in an agency environment, which is obviously beneficial if you have ambitions to run your own show. It can also lead to you making more money than you otherwise would have, which applies to both agency and in-house experiences.

17. And one final point. If you are in a global PR agency (and there are plenty of them) there are opportunities to work overseas for the same agency. Ah, if only I was smart enough to figure that one out when I was younger!

Summary

I always counsel less experienced practitioners to get at least a few years of agency experience under their belt. It is a dynamic, fast moving, pressurised environment that is a lot of fun. You are expected to deliver and deliver fast. Working in-house can lead to this high quality delivery mentality too, but with agency you are much more likely to get there quicker and to keep it. I highly recommend it.

What are your thoughts on working in a PR agency? What are your good and bad experiences? Is there one environment you prefer working in – agency or in-house? What do you think about the positive points of working in a PR agency made in this post?

PS: I’d welcome you joining networks with me through my LinkedIn profile. Send me an invite!

PPS. And don’t forget you can subscribe to this blog via email or RSS at the top of the blog’s page, or Tweet about this post using the handy RT button, adding your own editorial two cents worth!

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • email
  • RSS

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

9 Comment(s)

  1. Great blog!

    I can see your point about being taken more seriously as an expert when you work for a firm. I’ve never worked at a PR firm, but have been employed as a communications officer for a number of places. In my experience this can be frustrating at times because not a lot of other employess (including bosses) completely understand public and media relations.

    Brad McNulty | Jun 12, 2010 | Reply

  2. Hey Craig, I agreed with your earlier post regarding the benefits of working in-house and I also agree with this post about the benefits of working at an agency. So, if you are a hypocrite for have these two very different opinions then I am guilty too.

    We (PR folks) are very fortunate to have numerous employment options. I’ve worked at very good PR agencies and I’ve worked at a couple of terrible agencies, but good or bad working at an agency (especially for inexperienced folks) is like PR boot camp. It is intense and educational.

    paul roberts | Jun 13, 2010 | Reply

  3. Thanks Brad and Paul for your thoughts.

    Actually, Brad, I am often frustrated at the profession as a whole as it seems fixated on communicating ‘out’ and does not work hard enough to identify organisational stakeholders’ perspectives, then communicate those perspectives ‘in’ to the organisation.

    When this occurs, we act as advocates for stakeholders and prompt our organisations to operate more in line with stakeholders’, and by implication society’s, needs and wants.

    Craig | Jun 13, 2010 | Reply

  4. OK, time to admit I’ve sat on both sides of the fence, too. Like Paul, if being able to see the plus sides of both roles makes me a hypocrite, then so be it. I agree that too often external agencies talk external PR (because they get it), but one thing worth mentioning is that it depends on the agency. Some are obsessed with a particular business model, and can’t be flexible enough to match their product to client need. The pursuit of profit adds a different pressure to the advice. In-house should be more objective, because it isn’t tainted by the need to feed lots of other mouths back at the agency. Further to my comment on your “in-house kicks butt” post, that’s where I decided that being in-house meant I could look a CEO in the eyes and say “no, that’s not a good idea”. No kissing up to win pitches and earn retainers.

    Catherine Sweet | Jun 17, 2010 | Reply

  5. Yeow, harsh but, I have to say, pretty pragmatic re the approach some agencies take, Catherine. So much of their work is project – not holistic strategy – driven that forcing work over the line that may not be 100% on the money is something, commercially speaking, they have little choice in doing.

    I have worked in and around agencies a lot, however, and this is not a common occurence.

    What do agency people reading this think?

    Craig | Jun 17, 2010 | Reply

  6. Craig – great pair of posts. I’ve been much more on the in-house side, so am a bit biased. When I consulted before (2001-2003) I was a trainer as well as strategic facilitator. Many times, I just dropped my bombs and left, never to know whether my wisdom simply trickled out the door after me.

    I liked having a multi-month time horizon for projects as an in-house guy!

    The deal with agencies is bringing them deep enough into the company that they do more than just spout their stock material. That takes a lot of work. Even something as simple as writing — when an agency does it, it reflects more of the agency style than the client’s style, except in certain cases.

    And, I had much more balance in my life in-house — especially now, as an entrepreneur – I don’t eat if I don’t win business!

    Good stuff!
    S.

    Sean Williams | Jun 17, 2010 | Reply

  7. Love this post Craig! But then I’m biased, as my PR experience has only been agency-side. I would add that working in an agency provides a great opportunity (especially for those just starting their career) to work on a range of clients. I love that I am able to work with not-for-profit, tourism, corporate and consumer business on their communications strategies, and believe that this has helped strengthen my skills and adaptability as a PR professional.

    Jessie Morris | Jun 17, 2010 | Reply

  8. Thanks for your comments Jessie and Sean. It is great to get the perspective of a practitioner in the earlier stages of their career, Jessie. Your point about diversity of industries, not just clients, is certainly a good one.

    Your comment about the need to adapt writing style (and other tactics to client/organisation approaches) is an interesting one, Sean. I fully agree with you, but I have also found that a good consultant influences both the strategy and communication ‘voice’ or ’style’ of an organisation. So I guess, as with many things, there are shades of grey in the mix here.

    Craig | Jun 17, 2010 | Reply

  9. “With PR, if you intend to work in-house, begin first within agency.” This is what my talented teacher says!

    I am neither working in-house, nor in agency yet. In fact I am excited to start @ agency.

    Quality in PR comes from there as you already cited them ( fast and dynamic, diversity of communication problems and excellent human resources).

    Moro

    morosiaka | Jun 22, 2010 | Reply

1 Trackback(s)

  1. Aug 12, 2010: from When Agencies Can’t be Transparent | davefleet.com

Post a Comment

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes