Women in PR: why they win

The practice of public relations is an inherently feminine activity. This doesn’t mean that it has to be undertaken by women or that guys who practice PR are men-in-frocks (that’s another post!), but it does mean that many of the qualities of an excellent PR pro are feminine rather than masculine.

I wonder, does it also mean that women are better at PR than men or, alternatively, have a head start over them?

You tell me!

For me, it definitely means that women have a head start. I read an excellent academic exploration of this issue a number of years ago and, to the best of my memory, this post explores some of the points, and others, it made.

Empathy

This is one area where women come out ahead of men. And this doesn’t just mean showing empathy, it means actually feeling what the other person or organisation is feeling. By having this feeling, some might argue that it gives a valuable additional dimension to the more intellectual quality of understanding the other person’s or organisation’s situation.

I am not implying that men have a greater intellectual capability to understand another’s situation. As far as I am concerned, women and men are equal on the intellectual capability scorecard.

But on this point, like others noted here, I am sure psychologists would have a field day.

Empowerment

It has been purported that women are better than men at sharing power, encouraging and mentoring employees (including direct reports) and sharing and giving praise.

Personally, I have experienced women bosses doing this to a very high standard. I have also experienced the reverse. If push comes to shove, however, I tend to think this is a generally accurate presumption.

Creativity in PR

There is no question that creativity is absolutely necessary if you are going to succeed in public relations. It is necessary, and appreciated, at all levels of the field. One of the challenges of being creative is being so within constraints: financial, reputation, positioning – all have limitations as to where creativity can go.

I tend to think that this is one reason why women dominate PR. They can let go, more easily than men, of the strictures that inhibit the mind from flying free and coming up with fresh ideas.

Women are better writers than men

Oh ho – now we’re getting onto something!

This is an extension of the creativity theme, to a degree, but also simply that some might say women have a tendency to go for arts and men are more inclined to the sciences. Now I am not so sure about this at all (though stats may well bear it out), but I do know that writing is the number one PR skill.

It is even more important than being a genuinely nice person, which is pretty high up the list.

As for me, I’m not sure women are better writers at all, but I’ve certainly come across some fantastic ones.

Conversational

I tend to think that, partly due to the greater degree of empathy that women possess, they are superior at having conversations with a wide range of people. They are more relaxed with people and can facilitate conversations better than men.

Perhaps this is coloured by my own inadequacies in the conversationalist realm (I’m a terrible ‘function networker’!), but I genuinely think this is the case. And this capability of women extends into non-face-to-face realms as well, providing an excellent basis for them to build meaningful relationships with stakeholders.

An interesting echo of this point is, according to research undertaken by Brian Solis, women are far more hooked into social media (um, a collection of conversational mediums when it’s humming) than men.

Women are more intelligent than men

Well, I am thinking high school results here. And how hard it is to get into PR university courses. It’s almost as difficult as getting into medicine and law last time I looked. And it’s my understanding that there are a lot more women getting into PR courses than men in Australia.

Ipso facto, better high school marks and more places in uni courses could reflect, and/or lead to, women being more intelligent than men.

Multitasking superiority in PR

Gemma Craven of Ogilvy said in the video interview below that women are better multi-taskers than men, with PR being a very heavy multi-tasking environment.

It is a fair enough observation, and at least one study confirms women’s multi-tasking superiority. But at the end of the day I don’t think being a poor multi-tasker stops men from entering the profession. It may impact on their rise through the ranks, but I highly doubt that less than ideal multi-tasking will prompt them to leave it.

So I don’t agree with this point being one of any significance.

Women are more ethical than men

Being ethical is a fundamental component of best practice PR. And women are definitely more ethical than men.

Or are they? Well, according to that great truth factory, Hollywood, they’re not. They’re equal. Just check this Thank You For Smoking clip.

Men in marcomms are too up themselves

In an interesting discussion from a couple of years ago in Australia’s Marketing magazine, Mark Ritson essentially said that women in marketing are more humble than men. The former are more likely to put the good of the organisation ahead of their own ego.

Interestingly, it’s all to do with women’s brains. They’re better than men’s – in marketing, and by extension PR, anyway.

Women and men in PR: and the winner is…

At the end of the day, of course, and don’t bore me and everyone else if this is the only comment you have, it is all about the individual. But do not forget one thing: women totally DOMINATE the numbers in PR. There must be real, tangible reasons for this.

So maybe some of the above points are true. Maybe they’re not? What do you think?

What aspects of women’s character that help them in PR and, perhaps, give them an advantage over men in the field have I missed? Are men or women inherently better at PR? Or where do you think men have an advantage over women? Or, simply, is there NO ADVANTAGE between the sexes when it comes to the practice of PR?

PS: I’d welcome you joining networks with me through my LinkedIn profile. Send me an invite! PPS. And don’t forget you can subscribe to this blog via email or RSS at the top of the blog’s page, or Tweet about this post using the handy RT button, adding your own editorial two cents worth!

PPS. And don’t forget you can subscribe to this blog via email or RSS at the top of the blog’s page, or Tweet about this post using the handy RT button, adding your own editorial two cents worth!

Related posts



  • http://www.textwrite.co.nz Peter Heath

    Now that, sir, is what I call atonement! Love it – I can’t wait for the reaction…

  • http://paulrobertspr.blogspot.com/ Paul Roberts

    Hi Craig, I really enjoyed this post. While I wish I had a controversial comment to post, honeslty (and I swear I’m not just trying to be politically correct here) I never noticed that men or women are inherently better at any specific tasks. I’ll have to be more observant.

  • http://craigpearce.info/ Craig Pearce

    Thanks Peter and Paul. I wonder, will Mary be the next to comment?

    Paul, that’s why we have academics. They analyse, then confirm or refute what we mere mortals suspected. The post is mainly about feminine vs masculine traits, but clearly each sex tends to have more than the other!

  • Andrew

    There is plenty of evidence, even on Wall Street, that would go along with this. I was a big fan of West Wing (I know, don’t shoot me), but it became more interesting when the Presidental role was a woman…

  • http://mystupidities.blogspot.com/search/label/Public%20Relations Sriganesh R

    Personally, I think this cannot be generalized. I have worked with both good and bad PR professionals. And you wouldn’t be surprised to know that both the sexes are equally capable of being on either side of performance and professionalism.

    But where this article really makes senses is that, if we remove man vs. women, it has the characters and attitude that PR professionals should possess.

  • http://www.jaffepr.com Mary Long

    Had to comment when I saw my name! Haha. I don’t know that women have an edge, honestly, as there are likely SOME PR-advantageous character traits that men could lay claim to . . . though we do seem to have it pretty wrapped up! Interesting post, that I’ll enjoy sharing – thanks! :)

  • Craig

    Thanks for your comments everyone. Boy, through here, Twitter and LinkedIn this one has sure touched a nerve – not surprising I guess.

    Andrew, I have to leave your comment alone – it could take me into troubled waters!

    Sriganesh, don’t be so uncommited, give it a shot!

    And nice touch, Mary. Thanks for giving men in PR a small amount of begrudging credit :) . We are so hard done by.

  • http://www.markitects.com Francine Carb

    Women are better multi-taskers

    Along the lines of the creativity theme, women are better at juggling lots of conflicting activities, which a top PR practitioner absolutely has to do. We are infinitely better at remembering all those little details that together make a very big difference.

  • Lolli

    I certainly agree that women are better communicators, and that there is an evolutionary explanation.

    Relationships mean a lot more to women on a primeaval level than men, who are generally more independent. This is still prevalent today if you look at how cliquey women tend to be compared to men, or all the Ask Annie columns with women bemoaning their lover’s lack of commitment. Our ancestral mothers would group together in times of peril to protect their young (sometimes called the ‘tend and befriend’ response), and therefore friendship would have been highly valued for support in a crisis.

    And of course this has evolved into a female need for close relationships (more than men); communication, trust and empathy are key to sustaining a good rapport with our nearest and dearest. We thrive on our social lives – it seems the stereotype of women spending too long on the phone has evidently been transferred to the forum of the internet.

    Compare this to our ancestral father who would have displayed the classic ‘fight or flight’ mechanism…i.e. every man out for himself to survive. Having been friends with groups of men and women, it is clear that the men are comfortable with looser friendships, and don’t seem to be bothered if someone is a little distant…whereas a woman would constantly fret about her friend, wondering if it was something she had said…

    However, the point you made about women having a higher level of intelligence than men – based on high school results may be misconceived. I remember reading somewhere that girls tend to do better in schools than boys is down to the way in which education is conducted and its biases towards girls:

    http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/genderbias.html

    Interesting article.

    Anyway, great post Craig…glad to see that I’ve got a shot at entering the PR world in any case!

  • Craig

    Very interesting observations, Lolli. The report you linked to is certainly thought provoking. I’m not sure whether all men or women would rush to agree with you but it takes all types. Thanks again and hope to see you drop by and share you wisdom and insights again.

  • http://greenbanana.wordpress.com/2011/07/27/talking-about-my-generation-pr-and-pretty-young-things/ Talking about my generation – PR and pretty young things « Heather Yaxley – Greenbanana views of public relations and more

    [...] believe this means we have to stop portraying PR as “an inherently feminine activity” (as Craig Pearce argued) which is based on the outdated career theory of matching traits to occupations.  This [...]

  • http://teachwriting2012.wordpress.com/2012/02/05/giving-the-silenced-a-voice/ Giving the Silenced a Voice | Community of Writers

    [...] fields, there are some fields where women are very well represented. In non-profits and public relations, women are very well represented. The same holds true for teaching at all levels of education. I [...]

  • Anonymous

    What a bunch of bullshit. If you had a panel of men saying that the
    reason men dominate the science and tech fields is because men are just
    innately better, the women would be screaming sexism at the top of their
    lungs. Just ask Larry Summers. Women truly have overtaken men in 2
    areas- hypocrisy and bigotry.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes