Are pictures the forgotten tool in public relations?

Set against the back-drop of an increasingly fast-paced society, information overload and attention erosion, a three-part series of guest posts by professional illustrator and strategic communicator, Guy Downes, aims to spark conversation and information sharing on the combined role words and images can play in helping PR pros communicate and engage audiences more effectively.  

People’s preference for visual learning, the increasing levels of information overload and the fact that images help us process information quicker, provides a unique opportunity to PR professionals to take visual communication more seriously.  

Human beings, after all, process visuals 66,000* times faster than text, underlining the need for the public relations industry to bolster its already strong written and verbal skill set with more visual communication techniques and ‘visual thinking’.  

Together with the explosion of social media (and an ever-growing selection of visual channels, as well as the greater accessibility to technology that helps capture, create and share images (plus measure their success), the prospects for visual communication are greater than ever.  

Sailing through a PR sea of verbage

The power of visuals  

At home, work or play, how often do you:  

  • hear people say: “I get the picture”, “I see what you mean” or “The way I view it is this…”?
  • find it easier ‘to see what you are learning’ with pictures in a presentation?
  • refer to pictures in an instruction manual?
  • read or watch a story accompanied by pictures?

Without realising it, visual communication and visual thinking is ubiquitous in our day-to-day lives. And we don’t seem to give it much thought. But in terms of effective and engaging communication, perhaps we should.  

Traditionally, in PR and communications the trusted form of written communication has dominated: reports, press releases, presentations and whitepapers, to name but a few.   

Yet studies show that 65 per cent of us are visual learners#.  

Additionally, when words, images and colour are used together correctly, they can be a very persuasive mix.  Research indicates that:  

  • pictures interact with text to produce levels of comprehension and memory that can exceed what is produced by text alone^
  • using visual aids during a presentation was found to be 43 per cent more persuasive than not using visual aids+ 
  • besides improving readership by 40 per cent, colour also accelerates learning from 55 to 78 percent**, and comprehension by 73 per cent##. 

Visual thinking – what is it?  

Visual thinking is a wide-ranging topic but two experts in this area define it as:    

  • using pictures to help you solve problems, think about complex issues and communicate more effectively (David Gray)
  • our innate ability to use our eyes and our mind’s eye to discover, develop and share ideas (Dan Roam).

JWT’s 2010 Intelligence Report flags visual communication as a new trend to watch for this year. To be precise, JWT refers to it as the importance of ‘visual fluency’ (see their great video below) and defines it as the ‘growing preference and need for a graphic synthesis of information versus an avalanche of reading material’.  

 

So why do we need visual thinking?  

JWT’s definition for ‘visual fluency’ hits the mark. In today’s age of information overload, the battle for companies, brands and communication professionals to get their ‘messages’ noticed, understood and retained is greater than ever before. Consider these facts:  

  • On an average day, ‘a typical worker gets 200 e-mails, dozens of instant messages, multiple phone calls (office phone and mobile phone), several text messages not to mention the vast amount of content that he/she has to contend with’ (Basex 2009) 
  • Combined, the total paper and digital content in enterprises, governments, schools, and small businesses around the world will grow 67% a year between now and 2012 (IDC on behalf of Xerox, 2009).

Put simply, people are drowning in information and their attention is eroding.  

   

Eroding attention from the business of communication

What do you think about visual communication and its ability to communicate effectively? Is it used often enough by professional communicators? Can it convey the subtleties of all the information we need to communicate? Where can it be best utilised? What experiences can you share of where you have used visual communication to effectively engage stakeholders? What evocative and effective illustrations/images can you share with us?  

About Guy Downes  

Guy Downes is a graphic recorder and award-winning illustrator who runs his own visual communications venture.  Guy has 10 years experience in communication and public relations, having previously spent six years at Howorth (an Ogilvy PR Worldwide company) in Sydney and four years In London working for Banner and Weber Shandwick Technologies. Guy can be contacted at guy@guydownes.com.au   

   

The second post in this series will discuss where visual communication can be useful in PR and different visual communication techniques. The final post will discuss barriers to visual communication adoption (and some solutions…). 

* 3M Research 

# Reaching the Visual Learner: Teaching Property Through Art, William C. Bradford, University of Florida – Warrington College of Business 

^ J.R. Levin, A Transfer of Appropriate Process Perspective of Pictures in Prose 

+ University of Minnesota/3M Research, Persuasion and the Role of Visual Presentation Support, June 1986 

** Embry, David, “The Persuasive Properties of Color”, Marketing Communications, October 1984. 

## Johnson, Virginia, “The Power of Color”, Successful Meetings, June 1992, Vol 41, No. 7, pp. 87, 90.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • email
  • RSS

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

6 Comment(s)

  1. The Bad Pitch Blog just did a post about press release alternatives, and I’ve written odes to pictures.

    Pictures, graphics, great chart porn can tell the story so much better, faster than the words. It’s important as communicators to work with our clients, let them know when to tell vs. when to show. FWIW.

    Davina K. Brewer | Mar 26, 2010 | Reply

  2. Agree, agree, agree. Guy is a consumate illustrator and visual communicator. He understand intricately the interface between illustration and how to use it to best effect to convey a message or engate an audience having spent a number of years in PR.
    Thanks for reminding me again just how powerful visual comms can be. It is a highly underutilised comms tool.

    Craig Badings | Mar 26, 2010 | Reply

  3. Love your work GD
    TV news producers can probably be classed as as amongst the worst offenders in visual literacy, so long as they try to keep images and words in sync. If the script mentions a cat, they seem to feel obliged to show a cat.
    The best visual literacy seems to grow amongst readers of comics, where readers’ imaginations are left to do some of the work, especially between the panels.
    PR agencies could use comics more frequently to support campaigs, such as the “street wise’ publications a few decades ago.

    Peter Hindmarsh | Mar 26, 2010 | Reply

  4. I’m just terrified by this. I have a visual sense, but am by no means an artist or graphic designer. I’m also a “words guy,” so I love the well-crafted sentence, the pungent paragraph and heady discourse that only words provide.

    Visual comms — see Edward Tufte — can indeed be hugely important and effective…but not by me! I guess I’ll have to make good friends with some creative sort, somewhere…

    ;-)
    Sean
    @commammo

    Sean Williams | Mar 29, 2010 | Reply

  5. Hi Davina, Craig, Peter and Sean – thanks so much for your comments. Obviously, I’m a big believer in the impact visual communications can have and love working in this area. What I also find really interesting is why images have taken on a lesser role compared to words. Taking a step back, it seems that as we grow older (especially in schools and education institutions) we are taught that pictures and words play different roles and not to think of them in the same light. Plus, we are taught that each can help us convey meaning but writing and reading overtakes in importance as we get older – I think we carry this preference through school and into the workplace. John Berger said in his book ‘Ways of seeing’, “seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognises before it can speak”. Plus, for the most part, kids seem to draw before they can write. I think overtime, life reverses this creative process – we forget how to draw and how to have the confidence to draw and be creative (regardless of how good we are). What do you think? Do you agree? I’d be interested in your thoughts if you had time. Cheers, Guy

    Guy Downes | Apr 6, 2010 | Reply

  6. Well done Guy – great stuff.

    We vastly underuse visuals both in the graphic and photgraphic sense and also in the language we use.

    The human brain has eveolved over millions of years and the old brain – the part that decides – loves visuals. Mainly because it mainly evolved before words were invented – roughly 40,000 years ago.

    However, most visuals don’t work for us because they lack story, emotion focus and all the other elements we need to win hearts and minds.

    Here we can use words that evoke emotions and images for the old brain to process. Not your standard core messages which just don’t work. I’m talking about clusters of words that are worth 1,000 pictures.

    US marketing guru Doug Hall is famous for humbling CEOs and Marketing Directors at his tree-changing marketing hothouse Eureka Ranch. He asks 15 evidence-based questions, each with only two multiple choice answers. As Doug says, even if you guess you should statistically score 7.5. But these guys are the elite, so you would expect higher.

    Nope, they average 6.

    One example will show you why. It describes that you have some complex information on which you want to get a group of people to take action and asks which is the best method; creating a graphic that summarises and visually relates the material – or – using a formula of words.

    The answer – verified through numerous laboratory and field tests – is a formula of words – but a special formula in the sense it is a story. Because the graphic is essentially still rational information, and the story evokes emotion and encompasses other powerful elements.

    Sorry for the long post. But I wanted to both recognise that Guy has done us a great service and I support his recomendations, and at the same time show that the right words can (and need to be) at the centre of our high-impact communication.

    Visuals are way underused by us, but so are the kind of words that make teh greatest difference. Hint: about the other guy, simple, concrete, high-contrast, strong verbs and nouns, good context, evoking emotion and especially fascination.

    More power to you Guy

    Best wishes

    Geoff

    Geoff Kelly | Apr 17, 2010 | Reply

2 Trackback(s)

  1. Apr 7, 2010: from Annual reports as really useful public relations ...?? | Public relations and managing reputation
  2. Apr 15, 2010: from The barriers to visual communication adoption | Public relations and managing reputation

Post a Comment

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes