THE SHOCKING TRUTH OF PR (Part 1)

I have been shocked recently (well, not really, but definitely bitterly disappointed) by the lack of understanding of what constitutes public relations. This includes how business-relevant and business-beneficial the discipline is, as well as how much it can benefit society.

The biggest mistake people make is thinking that public relations is a synonym for media relations. In a business environment of this maturity, it simply defies belief that otherwise intelligent people can possess this understanding.

But, believe it or not, and I am talking about public relations professionals as well as marketing professionals here, both of whom should know better , this seems to be the case. I base this perception on interaction with communication professionals as well as responses I have seen to posts on various blogs in recent times.

The biggest sinners are public relations professionals themselves:

  • They frequently – and I am taking senior leaders as well as the discipline’s foot soldiers – use the ‘PR’ terminology to specifically describe media relations. I have heard it occur time and time again. For as long as this nomenclature is used to describe media relations then other PR professionals, marketers, the broader business community, the media and the whole ‘great unwashed’ general community will continue to subscribe to the fallacy that PR=media relations
  • As implied above, the public relations industry itself has done a pretty average of promoting its business-relevant, strategic relationship management and society-benefiting capabilities.

In a nutshell, public relations is about creating, enhancing and/or maintaining mutually beneficial relationships between an organisation and its stakeholders. When operating at its optimum level it is less about control than facilitating dialogue and understanding.

This leads to change, both in organisational behaviour and communication and organisational stakeholder behaviour and communication.

This post summarises some of the strategic and tactical dimensions of public relations that are commonly applied in a functional, utilitarian manner to help organisations (and their stakeholders). More detail is in this post’s ‘partner’.

Market research

  • Clarifying what the research is being undertaken for
  • Developing insights based on the findings
  • Using the insights to shape communication strategy.

Issues and crisis management

  • Issues management is about influencing an organisation to operating more in line with stakeholder expectations, as well as how it communicates with stakeholders on an ongoing basis
  • Crisis management is when the s^#* has actually hit the fan and the communication professional has been brought in to minimise the reputational damage and to maintain, as much as possible, the quality of relationships the organisation has with its stakeholders.

Corporate social responsibility

  • At its core, public relations and CSR do pretty much the same thing: motivate organisations to operate more in line with community/stakeholder expectations
  • The PR professional is ideally placed, then, to play a large role in organisational CSR policy/culture-making, implementation and, of course, communication.

Change management and employee communication

  • Public relations facilitates change, including both internal and external stakeholders
  • Employees of a brand are its greatest potential brand advocates. Without their support the brand is doomed.

Strategy

Finally, of course, when really this is first activity (but I have put it here just to be perverse), the overarching strategic activity of the public relations leader is devising a communication strategy for an organisation and managing its implementation. This includes most aspects of an organisation’s positioning and branding.

Public relations’ tactical activities

There are a range of activities that fall under the more practical, day-to-day side of public relations activities. Some of these include:

  • Media relations – big-reach metro but also B2B and special interest (e.g. music media), which is much more targeted
  • Social media (very much a PR-centric activity because it is intrinsically a dialogic and relationship-building mechanism – two characteristics at the heart of strategically applied public relations)
  • Website – primarily content, but also strategic architecture advice
  • Events and launches
  • Publication production (anything from annual reports to brochures)
  • Database management and direct communication mechanisms like newsletters, e-newsletters
  • Community consultation (think engineering projects, nuclear waste sites next to your local PCYC etc)
  • Sponsorship
  • School education programs
  • Speaking engagements (at business/industry conferences); putting together speeches, presentations, pitching to the event organisers.

More

See Part 2 of this post for a more in-depth discussion of the strategic dimensions of public relations and a conclusion.

Related posts



  • http://craigpearce.info/?p=63 Business relationships and reputation

    [...] symmetrical communication defines public relations as a socially beneficial business discipline (no, that’s not an oxymoron), partly because it [...]

  • http://craigpearce.info/public-relations/what-it-takes-to-work-in-public-relations/ What it takes to work in public relations | Public relations and managing reputation

    [...] of the above. Strategy is an overused and misused word. Strategy should be no more complicated than understanding big [...]

  • http://craigpearce.info/public-relations/leading-public-relations-blog-discussed-wild-fearless-and-intelligent/ Leading public relations blog discussed: wild, fearless and intelligent | Public relations and managing reputation

    [...] exhibits a wry sense of self-deprecation, as well. Karalee and I both fight the good fight on the ‘PR is a strategic business discipline’ front, but we realise it’s a Sisyphean challenge at worst, and a long, slow haul at [...]

  • http://craigpearce.info/uncategorized/annual-reports-helping-win-the-pr-war/ Annual reports: helping win the PR war | Public relations and managing reputation

    [...] does it fit with your broader communication strategy and tactical action plan over the next 18 [...]

  • http://craigpearce.info/public-relations/issues-management-is-inherent-to-all-intelligent-pr/ Issues management is inherent to all intelligent PR | Public relations and managing reputation

    [...] part of an holistic, integrated communication strategy all of these activities are thinking about the [...]

  • http://www.prlab.com.au Greg Smith

    Craig, well said. This is why I’m fed up with PR. Only yesterday I had a marketing person tell me she measures her organisation PR’s success by the number of media mentions. No regard for the message. And never mind that I have a PhD and 30 years of experience. I took her to task, but it just washed over her. She is likely to be a future colleague of mine (though not long term, I expect). This is why I am finishing my qualifications in fitness; so I can escape this bullshit.

  • Craig

    Well, Greg, they say that dinosaurs have died out. But clearly there are still plenty of business communicatators, marketers in particular, who resemble them!

  • http://craigpearce.info/marketing/marketers-lose-their-grip-on-social-media-brand-%e2%80%98control%e2%80%99/ Marketers lose their grip on social media brand ‘control’ | Public relations and managing reputation

    [...] about the fundamental strategic notion underpinning public relations of creating mutually beneficial relationships between an organisation and its stakeholders? If unfettered access is what stakeholders want, then effective PR professionals facilitate that [...]

  • http://www.areze.com torrent download

    Correct..

  • http://www.twitter.com/martinwalsh Martin Walsh

    Great post Craig!

    However, I have to professionally and strongly ‘beg to differ’ on Social Media Marketing (many of us long term practitioners call it Social Influence Marketing – SIM) being a PR-centric activity and websites falling under PR.

    Social Influence Marketing works really well when integrated across an organisation but rooted in the broader marketing department, not PR. Organisations like Microsoft, IBM, Nestle, Pepsi, Ford and many, many others do not isolate SIM into the PR discipline / department or agency. PR are involved in Social Influence Marketing but only in areas of pure crisis management in some more strategic aspects of online reputation management. Crisis Management and Online Reputation Management are a very small piece of Social Influence Marketing and too many people are too narrow in the views of what it is (and isn’t).

    Further, I could never imagine and have never experienced PR being involved with Microsoft.com, IBM.com or Pepsi.com except in cases where my team and I would help PR build and managed a Social Media Newsroom!

    Spot on with everything else!

    Best regards :D

  • http://www.luymes.com Robin Luymes

    Great job Craig. I’m disappointed with the persistent misperceptions of PR and all that it entails.

    I also agree with you that PR should rule the social media function since marketers are great at “pushing” messages out but don’t typically know how to continue a dialog (after all, it’s “social” media, not just media).

    There are other corporate functions that know how to share the brand story (marketing) and those that know how to answer certain questions (customer service) and those that listen really well to what publics have to say (market research) but few that can do all three (while simultaneously doing four or five other tasks).

  • Craig

    Thanks for the comments Martin and Robin.

    I can’t really add more than I have stated, but currently PR clearly has the conceptual rigour and to support social media in its full holistic sense. Marketing doesn’t as it is, after all, predicated on making money and social media is about that and so much more.

  • http://craigpearce.info/marketing/public-relations-important-making-money/ Public relations is more important than making money | Public relations and managing reputation

    [...] PR should, partially at least, be measured on its ability to drive sales and/or generate profits. Public relations is about building mutually beneficial relationships between an organisation and its…. Its contribution to business-related outcomes is significant. Better: stakeholder relationships, [...]

  • Raymond

    The case is much worse here in China based on my observation and experience. Quite a few companies hope that the PR agency they chose is able to boost their sales significantly as soon as the contract is being signed.  but as you know, according to my understading, PR do not directly generate sales and revenues. Once the PR agency did not bring the goal which the company invisaged , he may say that agency is unqualified.

  • http://twitter.com/PaulRobertsPAR Paul Roberts

    Hey Craig, good post as always – not sure how I missed it all this time. I agree with you and often share your frustration, but a large part of the problem – in my opinion – is with the industry itself and the under representation of corporate side PR folks.

    Too many of the leading PR voices are consultants and agency types whose job description is mostly centered on media relations. Many of the important activities you reference are best carried out by internal communications professionals, but these people are not well represented in these types of online conversations. 

    The sad truth is that what too many agency folks experience as PR really is JUST media relations and the people that are working on truly integrated programs are too busy doing the work to join these conversations. 

  • http://craigpearce.info/ Craig Pearce

    Raymond, I would argue, and there are others that do too, that you can in fact link PR activity dirctly to sales. It just takes some careful, and not necessarily expensive, mechanisms to measure the impact. Of course, there is plenty of longer term brand impact that PR can achieve too and perhaps this isn’t as easy to measure, but it is still quite possible. Look for Angela Sinikas in this blog and on the web in general and you’ll find useful information on this topic.

    Fair point about a lot of in-house people doing integrated comms/PR not being that vocal in discussions on the web, Paul. It’s left to agency types and academics to lead the conversations and the innovations. It’s disappointing that there isn’t a gretaer contribution from this sector of PR, but of course there are plenty of exceptions.

    The law of the jungle rules here, of course, as agency types need to keep a high profile to help get business, whilst academics are employed (i.e. paid) to lead the conversations – in-built incentivisation, if you like. Altruism isn’t enough of a carrot, in many instances!

  • Raymond

    Thanks Craig for your comments.

    As a matter of fact, we PR practitioners are forced to link PR service directly to sales because it’s the benchmark set by the overwhelming majority of  potential PR employers. What could we do but accept this?

blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes