The gift of complaints – how to turn misery into brand equity
By Craig on Nov 12, 2009 in Marketing, Public relations, Strategic communication
This is a guest post by Shirli Kirschner* – mediator, facilitator, trainer and coach – of Resolve Advisors.
In a world of undifferentiated products, there is an easy point of difference that many organisations don’t, won’t or can’t deliver on: fixing mistakes.
Managing mistakes is a way to demonstrate credibility and put some substance behind the hype. It is the equivalent of the friend who is there for the crisis.
A good adviser can assist in ensuring the right questions are asked by management. He or she can also help ensure that systems operate flawlessly to keep the hard earned customer, giving great grist to the gossip mill through valuable feedback the customer will provide to his or her peer group.
An angry consumer is an opportunity not a threat. But the anger needs to be tackled holistically and strategically. Does your organisation, or do your clients, have a reliable and rewarding process (and culture) in place for responding to mistakes and complaints?
Brand divorce – 1#
Recently, a friend of mine from mothers group was telling me about her trek up to a major retailer of electrical equipment in Bondi Junction, two kids, one on each hip, to return a faulty radio. The assistant refused to refund on the grounds that her receipt was five weeks old.
The assistant thought it was reasonable to obtain a refund within a month. My friend argued that she thought five weeks was reasonable. She then told them that as there was room for disagreement, their sign needed to be more explicit.
After calling the manager and with the kids in noise mode, faced with the argument, they then refunded her money.
Her return wasn’t within a month – with two young kids she hadn’t opened the radio’s box within that time.
Hot and bothered, with stressed kids and her refund, she walked out with a story to regale her girlfriends with.
I went to buy a camera the next day and steered clear of that store…
Brand divorce – 2#
I bought blinds from a store in Randwick. Alas, after getting the fabric wrong the hanging was worse. “We will call you back and see what to do…”
Three days later and no-one had even called to discuss how to fix the problem… one week later their technical person came sans appointment, shook his head and said…’ this is a mess and I will need to check when I can get back to you.
No solution just a shake of the head. I will never use them again and neither will any of my friends.
Brand love – more than a one night stand
I fly (in planes…) regularly enough to be a high ranking loyalty member, flying nationally on discount tickets. I am your typical small business consumer… I miss planes, book the wrong days, have my card demagnetise…
The other day I missed a plane – big time. I was still in a meeting when it began to board. I called Virgin and the always happy operator said, “What is your story…” “l was one and a half hours late getting in this morning and I haven’t caught up,” I said.
I expected to have to buy another ticket. I was stressed.
“That’s a bit stressful for you – what flight were you on this morning?”, she asked, without missing a beat. I told her. She checked: “Well, I can’t take the stress out of the day after we were so late but I can apologise, put a note on your file and ensure that you can get on any plane when you get to the airport. Is there anything else I can do for you?”
I went from frazzled to relieved. At that point I would have shouted “I love Virgin” from the rooftops and beyond. After seven years of loyal service to another airline – I moved over and joined the Virgin Lounge and loyalty program. Millions of dollars of advertising could not have impressed me as much as that.
Her interpersonal skills were excellent (great active listening with no sugar coating) and her problem solving skills were on the money. More impressive was the fact that Virgin management had empowered their front line staff to make a decision like that. To me, that is true branding.
I want to belong to an organisation like that. I just need to think through the organisations that I deal with regularly. The ones that I am loyal to are the ones that know how to handle not just the good times – but the bad ones too. There are a few: Sebel Melbourne, Fratelli Fresh in Waterloo and Circulon cookware.
Circulon replaced the glass lid to my pot, honouring a lifetime guarantee when I sent them a photo to show it had shattered (no receipt required). Circulon’s attitude to my shattered lid really sold me on the concept that this is a pot for life. I just bought another two. It feels like good value at the price if I have it that long!
Up, up and away
Companies spend billions on brand awareness because they want consumers to be seduced into buying whatever the illusion is: luxury, love, success… Companies often forget that the consumer relationship is not only about getting the consumer in; it is also about how you manage the inevitable mistakes. Complaint handling is part of the ‘taste’ of the brand, particularly in service industries.
Many companies get public relations people in to manage their disasters. Very few companies think to build a brand around customer complaints or how they address everyday glitches.
They take this approach at their peril. A dissatisfied consumer makes a noise. Sometimes loud, sometimes quietly. But that memory lasts a long time and the word of mouth damage can be devastating.
As for repeat business…fugeddaboutit.
Key strategic questions that need to be answered include:
- How do we want the complaints service to look and feel?
- What is the process for dealing with complaints; is it managed by a discrete department or frontline staff?
- What are the company’s values and service guarantee around that? How will it be fed into the way that bonuses are calculated and staff remunerated? And, for that matter, position descriptions?
- How will it be measured? Will it be transparent – promoted internally and externally, or just quietly delivered?
- How will the value of it be represented in the triple bottom line (financial, management, relationship)?
Do you have similar experiences of organisations treating your complaints poorly? How did it impact on your relationship with the organisation? From a branding and reputation perspective, do you agree with Shirli? What are your thoughts?
[Shirli (right) works with organisations and individuals to effectively manage conflict and build consensus. This includes the mediation of disputes, facilitation of group process, strategic planning and capacity building. Her goal is to do meaningful work with individuals and organisations who understand that good process, seamlessly executed and invisible, is the key to delivering superior outcomes.]


Shirli – your assessment and advice is right-on! As a PR Professional who has served independent financial advisors and the institutions that serve them for over 20 years, I echo your sentiments and encourage all service-oriented professionals to heed your advice.
Successful companies and service providers have a strong brand promise (key word = promise). Promises that are not made lightly. Promises that they keep. When things go wrong, as they sometimes do in spite of all our best intentions, fixing problems graciously and without hassle is essential – it’s also, as you say, a great opportunity to build brand loyalty and create raving fans (versus the opposite result … handle a complaint badly and you not only lose a client/customer but untold many more people who would have done business with you simply because you have created a “bad mouthing” situation).
Thanks for this great post.
Marie Swift | Nov 13, 2009 | Reply
Shirli;
This is a great post and I love the use of Divorce as an indication of the struggle we all have in allowing a relationship to lapse, even if we’re truly annoyed at the other party.
Eric Goldman | Nov 13, 2009 | Reply
(Message from Shirli, guest blogger extraordinaire) Thanks for your comment, Marie (and yours too, Eric)! It is interesting that despite a few of us having this awareness. I am wondering if you have found an effective way to embed this in clients’ measurement of their bottom line. I always thought that if it became measurable in numbers it may make it easier to justify the kind of work needed to make a process smooth! AAMI say they have it in their metrics but not aware of any others!
Shirli
Craig | Nov 14, 2009 | Reply
Steven Howard – http://au.linkedin.com/pub/steven-howard/0/454/1b3 – made these really interesting comments on a LinkedIn group I wanted to share with others:
“There was research conducted in the 1980s that showed customers are more loyal to an organization after a complaint has been corrected or rectified in a fully satisfactory way than if no problem had occurred in the first place.
The key, of course, is making the customer fully satisfied with the corrective action taken after a complaint has been raised. Simply mollifying the customer after they have voiced a complaint did not have the same loyalty enhancing effect.
I believe this is true for two reasons:
a) correcting an error means an additional interaction with the customer has taken place, giving the customer something more to base their perceptions on than a single, error-free transaction, and
b) almost all complaint corrections require some sort of PERSONALIZED effort or compensatory action by the organization, and hence the customer is now treated as an individual with unique needs, wants, desires, likes and dislikes.
Any time an organization treats a customer as an individual and provides a level of personalized service, even when overcoming a complaint, this is bound to have a positive impact on loyalty building.”
Shirli responded by commenting:
“That’s a really interesting analysis. It may also have to do with building authenticity. In a world of hype when someone at least tries to deliver it makes them feel authentic and builds trust.
Having had round 4 with my curtain company- I have also discovered that when they try to fix it and do so badly (3 ring circus) that can seal the negative impression of the brand. The tricky bit is finding out if the customer is fully satisfied.
I for example have just said that is fine because I don’t trust them after their 3 failed attempts. I would rather just say thanks and quietly walk away. They are oblivious to the fact I will never use them again.
My comments and yours together mean that it has to be fixed well, and measured… interesting thing for me to think about thank you!!”
Craig | Nov 14, 2009 | Reply
Excellent article Shirli, I wrote a blog post along similar lines not long ago (yours is written much better though!)
Patrick Kennedy | Nov 16, 2009 | Reply
Nice item, but perhaps a tad simplistic. The Virgin agent probably wasn’t being “flexible”, it was probably just a well designed process.
Shirli’s comment to a comment on “authenticity” makes me think of one of those aphorisms that goes “the most important thing is sincereity, once you can fake that you’ve got it made”. Personalised service can be part of the design without detracting from the scale efficiencies in the mass customer service centre.
See my post.
David Havyatt | Nov 16, 2009 | Reply