PR for marketing communication president!

Public relations should own marketing communication because: the traditional one-way communication characteristic of marcomms tools is more effective if applied in a two-way manner; communication is conversation and PR knows these ropes best; direct marcomms can be enhanced by the thought leadership and narrative powers that are embedded in great PR programs.

The campaign starts here! Public relations should own marketing communication, not marketing itself!

But can PR handle the heat? Can it get its head around marketing communication? How come so little work undertaken by PR agencies is in the realm of marketing communication? Why can’t PR get its hands on communication program budget for direct, unmediated communication (social media aside)?

Is it because marketing owns advertising, which is the big budget business communication spend? And direct communication mechanisms get lumped into smaller budgets that go along with the big bucks baby? As the power of broadcast advertising diminishes, along with the collateral power that comes with spending money on it, I wonder whether the ad agencies power will also dissipate.

Ironic, don’t you think?

  • Marketing is, traditionally, primarily a one-way communication process, whereas PR is two-way communication. What’s more engaging, monologue or dialogue?
  • PR is in for long haul relationships and is concerned about the whole organisation-stakeholder relationship, not just the making money part. Marketing is all about the, primarily, short term concern of making money.

Morality, PR and marketing

Maybe that’s why marketers are the bankers of the communication industry. Take the money and run. No qualms over helping out with the promotion of fast food, leading to obesity, or encouraging poor people to either put their money into the pokies. How do they live with themselves?

Oh yes, alright, PR folk work with Maccas, Pizza Hut etc too. Not for me, thank you.

Does PR deserve to be given the big picture budget?

From what I have seen, the only PR folk who tend to get their hands on some marketing communication budget are those that work in-house and even then they’ll have to fight hard to get it.

But maybe PR people don’t deserve to have the budget. How many great case studies like the NPS’s integrated marketing communication campaign [link to Sue Corlette post] do you hear about? I think PR people are somewhat lazy in claiming marketing communication ground.

Evidence? A few years ago I went to a national PR conference that had an array of very interesting presentations from marketing, marketing communication and advertising professionals. Great stuff.

There were also some of your standard PR 101 heard-it-all-before-boring-as-batshit presentations on topics like ‘how to pitch to journalists’ (Jesus wept!). So where do you think 80% of conference attendees went? That’s right, you guessed it…our own worst enemies.

The value of databases and direct communication with target audiences and – very, very, very importantly – influencers on those target audiences is, I would have thought, incredible. In fact, invaluable.

Potential tactics include:

  • E-newsletters or direct mail
  • Social media
  • Events
  • Sponsorship
  • Brochures and flyers to complement all the above.

Opportunities for leveraging due to an effective integration of strategy and narrative are immense.  Opportunities are limited only by the imagination of the professional driving the campaigns and what market research has ascertained.

Actually, not limited, they are energised. Because creativity and the information that comes from market research is the engine room and the fuel, inclusively, of any great professional communicator.

I’ve said before that marketing should report to public relations, but maybe PR is too lazy and too short-sighted to actually get off its butt and take this opportunity that is right in front of its eyes.

What about you? What do you think? Have you got what it takes? Or are you in cruise mode? Happy with the status quo?

Or am I wrong? Go ahead. Make my day.

What are your favourite and most effective marketing communication mechanisms? What examples of their effective use can you share? Does it make you mad PR budgets get cut off at the marcomms pass?

PS: I’d welcome you joining networks with me through my LinkedIn profile. Send me an invite! PPS. And don’t forget you can subscribe to this blog via email or RSS at the top of the blog’s page, or Tweet about this post using the handy RT button, adding your own editorial two cents worth!

PPS. And don’t forget you can subscribe to this blog via email or RSS at the top of the blog’s page, or Tweet about this post using the handy RT button, adding your own editorial two cents worth!

Related posts



  • http://www.thoughtleadershipstrategy.net/ Craig Badings

    Craig, now that’s what a call prodding a few sacred cows but I think you may be onto something.

    It’s all about power and who controls the purse strings. Traditionally marketing does and so PR is often the poor cousin at the receiving end of a smaller budget and the misguided perception in many (not all) instances that we only ‘do’ media. Until that perception changes we will continue to play a minor role in overall marketing communication.

  • http://www.nospinpr.com Ruth Seeley

    I was never much of a marcomms person when I worked for a global PR firm, but there’s a vast difference between supporting marketing aims/plans as a marcomms person and OWNING the function. What do PR people know about distribution and pricing, really, and why should this be something they too have to master?

    Perhaps it’s my own personal prejudice – and certainly since forming my own consultantcy and working with authors who generally don’t have marketing plans I’ve had to get involved in and advise on distribution and pricing – but I’d really much rather have someone else looking after and advising on these details. I’m lucky in that I do know a little about marketing and sales of books, having worked for both a book publisher and for a couple of bookstores. But I’d be seriously out of my depth in other areas where I don’t really understand how the ‘channel’ works. And I don’t think I’d feel justified in asking for my fees in that situation.

    And – well – isn’t this a bit like the ‘who owns internal comms – PR/corp comms or HR’ debate?

  • Craig

    Thanks for the thoughts Craig and Ruth.

    From a strategic perspective, as PR folk are much more concerned with the holistic organisation-stakeholder relationship than turn-a-buck-focused marketers, I believe we are inhernetly best suited for far more communication tactics then we are often given credit for.

    The sales/pricing/etc side, Ruth, I agree is best left with ’straight’ marketing, but that doesn’t mean to give we can invest much more depth and meaning and resonance into marketing communication. There is a difference between marketing and marketing communication, even though it is subtle.

    I work on website content, brochures, POS, convention stands and collateral – all marketing communication and, I would like to think, it benefits from my thinking which is concerned about more about value-adding relationships than short term sales.

  • http://makenart.blogspot.com Jess

    I have to disagree that ALL marcomms tools are more effective if applied in a two-way manner. I think everything has its place and it really depends what your goals are and who your target audience actually is.

    I think PR really only has itself to blame. Practitioners don’t define what they do well, and so PR is still seen as ‘spin, media relations, and free publicity’…so what do you need a budget for?

    While us educated folk know there is more to it than that, until you can define the field a little better and demonstrate ROI like the marketing and advertising groups then I think you’ll just have to be absorbed into the Marcomm teams. :P

  • Craig

    Jess, stop it, you’re depressing me! Thanks for the comment and I agree that PR so often shoots itself in the foot.

    You’ll note in recent posts the topics of ROI and defining and meeting KPIs has been discussed. Lots of room for improvement in PR there.

    And I agree that not all marcomms tools need to be two-way. Time and place…

blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes